| 世界を見据え、日本人としての気概を持って生きた明治の知識人。
 第4章 茶室 (内容抜粋)   
朗読試聴
 茶室は、詩心に場所を与えるために建てられた仮の住まいという意味で「好みの家」となるし、そのときどきの美的要求を満たすために置かれるもの以外は一切の装飾がないという観点から「空っぽの家」となる。また、「不完全さ」を尊び、何かをわざわざ仕上げないまま残しておき、想像力がそれを完成させる余地を残すという点において「非対称な家」となる。
 茶室の見かけはぱっとしない。日本の家屋のどれよりも小さく、建築に用いられる材料は「わび」すなわち「風雅な貧しさ」を演出するようにもくろまれている。忘れてならないのは、これらはすべて奥の深い芸術的配慮に基づくものであり、細部に至るまで、どんなに豪華な宮殿や寺院を建てるときよりも綿密な注意が払われていることである。
 
       To European architects brought up on the traditions of stone and brick      construction, our Japanese method of building with wood and bamboo seems      scarcely worthy to be ranked as architecture. It is but quite recently      that a competent student of Western architecture has recognised and paid      tribute to the remarkable perfection of our great temples. Such being the      case as regards our classic architecture, we could hardly expect the      outsider to appreciate the subtle beauty of the tea-room, its principles      of construction and decoration being entirely different from those of the      West.            The tea-room (the Sukiya) does not pretend to be other than a mere cottage—a      straw hut, as we call it. The original ideographs for Sukiya mean the      Abode of Fancy. Latterly the various tea-masters substituted various      Chinese characters according to their conception of the tea-room, and the      term Sukiya may signify the Abode of Vacancy or the Abode of the      Unsymmetrical. It is an Abode of Fancy inasmuch as it is an ephemeral      structure built to house a poetic impulse. It is an Abode of Vacancy      inasmuch as it is devoid of ornamentation except for what may be placed in      it to satisfy some aesthetic need of the moment. It is an Abode of the      Unsymmetrical inasmuch as it is consecrated to the worship of the      Imperfect, purposely leaving some thing unfinished for the play of the      imagination to complete. The ideals of Teaism have since the sixteenth      century influenced our architecture to such degree that the ordinary      Japanese interior of the present day, on account of the extreme simplicity      and chasteness of its scheme of decoration, appears to foreigners almost      barren.            The first independent tea-room was the creation of Senno-Soyeki, commonly      known by his later name of Rikiu, the greatest of all tea-masters, who, in      the sixteenth century, under the patronage of Taiko-Hideyoshi, instituted      and brought to a high state of perfection the formalities of the      Tea-ceremony. The proportions of the tea-room had been previously      determined by Jowo—a famous tea-master of the fifteenth century. The      early tea-room consisted merely of a portion of the ordinary drawing-room      partitioned off by screens for the purpose of the tea-gathering. The      portion partitioned off was called the Kakoi (enclosure), a name still      applied to those tea-rooms which are built into a house and are not      independent constructions. The Sukiya consists of the tea-room proper,      designed to accommodate not more than five persons, a number suggestive of      the saying "more than the Graces and less than the Muses," an anteroom      (midsuya) where the tea utensils are washed and arranged before being      brought in, a portico (machiai) in which the guests wait until they      receive the summons to enter the tea-room, and a garden path (the roji)      which connects the machiai with the tea-room. The tea-room is unimpressive      in appearance. It is smaller than the smallest of Japanese houses, while      the materials used in its construction are intended to give the suggestion      of refined poverty. Yet we must remember that all this is the result of      profound artistic forethought, and that the details have been worked out      with care perhaps even greater than that expended on the building of the      richest palaces and temples. A good tea-room is more costly than an      ordinary mansion, for the selection of its materials, as well as its      workmanship, requires immense care and precision. Indeed, the carpenters      employed by the tea-masters form a distinct and highly honoured class      among artisans, their work being no less delicate than that of the makers      of lacquer cabinets.            The tea-room is not only different from any production of Western      architecture, but also contrasts strongly with the classical architecture      of Japan itself. Our ancient noble edifices, whether secular or      ecclesiastical, were not to be despised even as regards their mere size.      The few that have been spared in the disastrous conflagrations of      centuries are still capable of aweing us by the grandeur and richness of      their decoration. Huge pillars of wood from two to three feet in diameter      and from thirty to forty feet high, supported, by a complicated network of      brackets, the enormous beams which groaned under the weight of the      tile-covered roofs. The material and mode of construction, though weak      against fire, proved itself strong against earthquakes, and was well      suited to the climatic conditions of the country. In the Golden Hall of      Horiuji and the Pagoda of Yakushiji, we have noteworthy examples of the      durability of our wooden architecture. These buildings have practically      stood intact for nearly twelve centuries. The interior of the old temples      and palaces was profusely decorated. In the Hoodo temple at Uji, dating      from the tenth century, we can still see the elaborate canopy and gilded      baldachinos, many-coloured and inlaid with mirrors and mother-of-pearl, as      well as remains of the paintings and sculpture which formerly covered the      walls. Later, at Nikko and in the Nijo castle in Kyoto, we see structural      beauty sacrificed to a wealth of ornamentation which in colour and      exquisite detail equals the utmost gorgeousness of Arabian or Moorish      effort.            The simplicity and purism of the tea-room resulted from emulation of the      Zen monastery. A Zen monastery differs from those of other Buddhist sects      inasmuch as it is meant only to be a dwelling place for the monks. Its      chapel is not a place of worship or pilgrimage, but a college room where      the students congregate for discussion and the practice of meditation. The      room is bare except for a central alcove in which, behind the altar, is a      statue of Bodhi Dharma, the founder of the sect, or of Sakyamuni attended      by Kashiapa and Ananda, the two earliest Zen patriarchs. On the altar,      flowers and incense are offered up in the memory of the great      contributions which these sages made to Zen. We have already said that it      was the ritual instituted by the Zen monks of successively drinking tea      out of a bowl before the image of Bodhi Dharma, which laid the foundations      of the tea-ceremony. We might add here that the altar of the Zen chapel      was the prototype of the Tokonoma,—the place of honour in a Japanese      room where paintings and flowers are placed for the edification of the      guests.            All our great tea-masters were students of Zen and attempted to introduce      the spirit of Zennism into the actualities of life. Thus the room, like      the other equipments of the tea-ceremony, reflects many of the Zen      doctrines. The size of the orthodox tea-room, which is four mats and a      half, or ten feet square, is determined by a passage in the Sutra of      Vikramadytia. In that interesting work, Vikramadytia welcomes the Saint      Manjushiri and eighty-four thousand disciples of Buddha in a room of this      size,—an allegory based on the theory of the non-existence of space      to the truly enlightened. Again the roji, the garden path which leads from      the machiai to the tea-room, signified the first stage of meditation,—the      passage into self-illumination. The roji was intended to break connection      with the outside world, and produce a fresh sensation conducive to the      full enjoyment of aestheticism in the tea-room itself. One who has trodden      this garden path cannot fail to remember how his spirit, as he walked in      the twilight of evergreens over the regular irregularities of the stepping      stones, beneath which lay dried pine needles, and passed beside the      moss-covered granite lanterns, became uplifted above ordinary thoughts.      One may be in the midst of a city, and yet feel as if he were in the      forest far away from the dust and din of civilisation. Great was the      ingenuity displayed by the tea-masters in producing these effects of      serenity and purity. The nature of the sensations to be aroused in passing      through the roji differed with different tea-masters. Some, like Rikiu,      aimed at utter loneliness, and claimed the secret of making a roji was      contained in the ancient ditty:     "I look beyond;          Flowers are not,          Nor tinted leaves.          On the sea beach          A solitary cottage stands          In the waning light          Of an autumn eve."       Others, like Kobori-Enshiu, sought for a different effect. Enshiu said the      idea of the garden path was to be found in the following verses:     "A cluster of summer trees,          A bit of the sea,          A pale evening moon."       It is not difficult to gather his meaning. He wished to create the      attitude of a newly awakened soul still lingering amid shadowy dreams of      the past, yet bathing in the sweet unconsciousness of a mellow spiritual      light, and yearning for the freedom that lay in the expanse beyond.            Thus prepared the guest will silently approach the sanctuary, and, if a      samurai, will leave his sword on the rack beneath the eaves, the tea-room      being preeminently the house of peace. Then he will bend low and creep      into the room through a small door not more than three feet in height.      This proceeding was incumbent on all guests,—high and low alike,—and      was intended to inculcate humility. The order of precedence having been      mutually agreed upon while resting in the machiai, the guests one by one      will enter noiselessly and take their seats, first making obeisance to the      picture or flower arrangement on the tokonoma. The host will not enter the      room until all the guests have seated themselves and quiet reigns with      nothing to break the silence save the note of the boiling water in the      iron kettle. The kettle sings well, for pieces of iron are so arranged in      the bottom as to produce a peculiar melody in which one may hear the      echoes of a cataract muffled by clouds, of a distant sea breaking among      the rocks, a rainstorm sweeping through a bamboo forest, or of the      soughing of pines on some faraway hill.            Even in the daytime the light in the room is subdued, for the low eaves of      the slanting roof admit but few of the sun's rays. Everything is sober in      tint from the ceiling to the floor; the guests themselves have carefully      chosen garments of unobtrusive colors. The mellowness of age is over all,      everything suggestive of recent acquirement being tabooed save only the      one note of contrast furnished by the bamboo dipper and the linen napkin,      both immaculately white and new. However faded the tea-room and the      tea-equipage may seem, everything is absolutely clean. Not a particle of      dust will be found in the darkest corner, for if any exists the host is      not a tea-master. One of the first requisites of a tea-master is the      knowledge of how to sweep, clean, and wash, for there is an art in      cleaning and dusting. A piece of antique metal work must not be attacked      with the unscrupulous zeal of the Dutch housewife. Dripping water from a      flower vase need not be wiped away, for it may be suggestive of dew and      coolness.            In this connection there is a story of Rikiu which well illustrates the      ideas of cleanliness entertained by the tea-masters. Rikiu was watching      his son Shoan as he swept and watered the garden path. "Not clean enough,"      said Rikiu, when Shoan had finished his task, and bade him try again.      After a weary hour the son turned to Rikiu: "Father, there is nothing more      to be done. The steps have been washed for the third time, the stone      lanterns and the trees are well sprinkled with water, moss and lichens are      shining with a fresh verdure; not a twig, not a leaf have I left on the      ground." "Young fool," chided the tea-master, "that is not the way a      garden path should be swept." Saying this, Rikiu stepped into the garden,      shook a tree and scattered over the garden gold and crimson leaves, scraps      of the brocade of autumn! What Rikiu demanded was not cleanliness alone,      but the beautiful and the natural also.            The name, Abode of Fancy, implies a structure created to meet some      individual artistic requirement. The tea-room is made for the tea master,      not the tea-master for the tea-room. It is not intended for posterity and      is therefore ephemeral. The idea that everyone should have a house of his      own is based on an ancient custom of the Japanese race, Shinto      superstition ordaining that every dwelling should be evacuated on the      death of its chief occupant. Perhaps there may have been some unrealized      sanitary reason for this practice. Another early custom was that a newly      built house should be provided for each couple that married. It is on      account of such customs that we find the Imperial capitals so frequently      removed from one site to another in ancient days. The rebuilding, every      twenty years, of Ise Temple, the supreme shrine of the Sun-Goddess, is an      example of one of these ancient rites which still obtain at the present      day. The observance of these customs was only possible with some form of      construction as that furnished by our system of wooden architecture,      easily pulled down, easily built up. A more lasting style, employing brick      and stone, would have rendered migrations impracticable, as indeed they      became when the more stable and massive wooden construction of China was      adopted by us after the Nara period.            With the predominance of Zen individualism in the fifteenth century,      however, the old idea became imbued with a deeper significance as      conceived in connection with the tea-room. Zennism, with the Buddhist      theory of evanescence and its demands for the mastery of spirit over      matter, recognized the house only as a temporary refuge for the body. The      body itself was but as a hut in the wilderness, a flimsy shelter made by      tying together the grasses that grew around,—when these ceased to be      bound together they again became resolved into the original waste. In the      tea-room fugitiveness is suggested in the thatched roof, frailty in the      slender pillars, lightness in the bamboo support, apparent carelessness in      the use of commonplace materials. The eternal is to be found only in the      spirit which, embodied in these simple surroundings, beautifies them with      the subtle light of its refinement.            That the tea-room should be built to suit some individual taste is an      enforcement of the principle of vitality in art. Art, to be fully      appreciated, must be true to contemporaneous life. It is not that we      should ignore the claims of posterity, but that we should seek to enjoy      the present more. It is not that we should disregard the creations of the      past, but that we should try to assimilate them into our consciousness.      Slavish conformity to traditions and formulas fetters the expression of      individuality in architecture. We can but weep over the senseless      imitations of European buildings which one beholds in modern Japan. We      marvel why, among the most progressive Western nations, architecture      should be so devoid of originality, so replete with repetitions of      obsolete styles. Perhaps we are passing through an age of democratisation      in art, while awaiting the rise of some princely master who shall      establish a new dynasty. Would that we loved the ancients more and copied      them less! It has been said that the Greeks were great because they never      drew from the antique.            The term, Abode of Vacancy, besides conveying the Taoist theory of the      all-containing, involves the conception of a continued need of change in      decorative motives. The tea-room is absolutely empty, except for what may      be placed there temporarily to satisfy some aesthetic mood. Some special      art object is brought in for the occasion, and everything else is selected      and arranged to enhance the beauty of the principal theme. One cannot      listen to different pieces of music at the same time, a real comprehension      of the beautiful being possible only through concentration upon some      central motive. Thus it will be seen that the system of decoration in our      tea-rooms is opposed to that which obtains in the West, where the interior      of a house is often converted into a museum. To a Japanese, accustomed to      simplicity of ornamentation and frequent change of decorative method, a      Western interior permanently filled with a vast array of pictures,      statuary, and bric-a-brac gives the impression of mere vulgar display of      riches. It calls for a mighty wealth of appreciation to enjoy the constant      sight of even a masterpiece, and limitless indeed must be the capacity for      artistic feeling in those who can exist day after day in the midst of such      confusion of color and form as is to be often seen in the homes of Europe      and America.            The "Abode of the Unsymmetrical" suggests another phase of our decorative      scheme. The absence of symmetry in Japanese art objects has been often      commented on by Western critics. This, also, is a result of a working out      through Zennism of Taoist ideals. Confucianism, with its deep-seated idea      of dualism, and Northern Buddhism with its worship of a trinity, were in      no way opposed to the expression of symmetry. As a matter of fact, if we      study the ancient bronzes of China or the religious arts of the Tang      dynasty and the Nara period, we shall recognize a constant striving after      symmetry. The decoration of our classical interiors was decidedly regular      in its arrangement. The Taoist and Zen conception of perfection, however,      was different. The dynamic nature of their philosophy laid more stress      upon the process through which perfection was sought than upon perfection      itself. True beauty could be discovered only by one who mentally completed      the incomplete. The virility of life and art lay in its possibilities for      growth. In the tea-room it is left for each guest in imagination to      complete the total effect in relation to himself. Since Zennism has become      the prevailing mode of thought, the art of the extreme Orient has      purposefully avoided the symmetrical as expressing not only completion,      but repetition. Uniformity of design was considered fatal to the freshness      of imagination. Thus, landscapes, birds, and flowers became the favorite      subjects for depiction rather than the human figure, the latter being      present in the person of the beholder himself. We are often too much in      evidence as it is, and in spite of our vanity even self-regard is apt to      become monotonous.            In the tea-room the fear of repetition is a constant presence. The various      objects for the decoration of a room should be so selected that no colour      or design shall be repeated. If you have a living flower, a painting of      flowers is not allowable. If you are using a round kettle, the water      pitcher should be angular. A cup with a black glaze should not be      associated with a tea-caddy of black lacquer. In placing a vase of an      incense burner on the tokonoma, care should be taken not to put it in the      exact centre, lest it divide the space into equal halves. The pillar of      the tokonoma should be of a different kind of wood from the other pillars,      in order to break any suggestion of monotony in the room.            Here again the Japanese method of interior decoration differs from that of      the Occident, where we see objects arrayed symmetrically on mantelpieces      and elsewhere. In Western houses we are often confronted with what appears      to us useless reiteration. We find it trying to talk to a man while his      full-length portrait stares at us from behind his back. We wonder which is      real, he of the picture or he who talks, and feel a curious conviction      that one of them must be fraud. Many a time have we sat at a festive board      contemplating, with a secret shock to our digestion, the representation of      abundance on the dining-room walls. Why these pictured victims of chase      and sport, the elaborate carvings of fishes and fruit? Why the display of      family plates, reminding us of those who have dined and are dead?            The simplicity of the tea-room and its freedom from vulgarity make it      truly a sanctuary from the vexations of the outer world. There and there      alone one can consecrate himself to undisturbed adoration of the      beautiful. In the sixteenth century the tea-room afforded a welcome      respite from labour to the fierce warriors and statesmen engaged in the      unification and reconstruction of Japan. In the seventeenth century, after      the strict formalism of the Tokugawa rule had been developed, it offered      the only opportunity possible for the free communion of artistic spirits.      Before a great work of art there was no distinction between daimyo,      samurai, and commoner. Nowadays industrialism is making true refinement      more and more difficult all the world over. Do we not need the tea-room      more than ever?      
引用文献1、
引用文献2
 |